Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Siantou v. CVS Rx Services Inc.

United States District Court, D. Maryland

December 19, 2018

Siantou
v.
CVS Rx Services Inc.

          AMENDED MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL

          PAUL W. GRIMM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         This memorandum confirms the trial date that has been set in this case and it provides the schedule for this case and certain instructions relating to trial preparation.

         December 28, 2018 Deadline for Motions in Limine

         January 4, 2019 Deadline for Responses to Motions in Limine

         January 4, 2019 Deadline for submitting Joint Pretrial Order; Joint Proposed Voir Dire Questions, Jury Instructions, and Special Verdict Forms; and any Unagreed Proposed Voir Dire Questions, Jury Instructions, and Special Verdict Forms.

         Friday January 11, 2019 at 9:00AM Pretrial Conference and Motions In Limine Hearing

         Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 9:00AM Jury Selection

         Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 9:00 AM Seven-Day Jury Trial to Begin

         Proposed Pretrial Order

         The pretrial order must comply with all provisions of Local Rule 106. The purpose of this proposed order is to summarize what is established and what needs to be resolved at trial. The proposed pretrial order shall include final stipulations, or requests for stipulations, of specific facts, which include the legal theories relied upon in each claim and defense. See Loc. R. 106.2(f). With regard to evidence, the proposed pretrial order must include a detailed list of “exhibits the parties agree may be offered in evidence without the usual authentication.” Loc. R. 106.2(h). The list of documents should be detailed and include each document by title. The list of witnesses must satisfy Local Rule 106.2(i). For depositions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 32, the parties shall include “[a] list of the pages and/or lines of any portion of a deposition to be offered in a party's case in chief or any counter-designations.” Loc. R. 106.2(k). If the parties do not plan to use depositions in their cases in chief, they may indicate the same and reserve the right to use depositions for impeachment. The parties will indicate their agreement, or lack thereof, as to admissibility of each document and any testimony to be presented as evidence. See Loc. R. 106.2(g), (1), (m).

         In addition to the information required by Local Rule 106.2(j), the pretrial order shall include for each party a concise summary of the opinion testimony expected from each witness identified by that party pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) who may testify at trial. See Loc. R. 106.2(m). The parties shall identify those witnesses designated pursuant to Rule 26(a)(2)(A) separately from those designated pursuant to Rule 26(a)(2)(B).

         Motions in Limine

          Motions in Limine and Responses in Opposition should be submitted in informal letters of no more than three pages, single-spaced, for each discreet evidentiary issue.

         Voir Dire, Jury ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.