Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jackson v. United States

United States District Court, D. Maryland

September 29, 2017

MICHAEL JACKSON Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Civ. Action No. ELH-16-1907

          MEMORANDUM

          Ellen L. Hollander, United States District Judge.

         On December 19, 2012, Michael Jackson, Petitioner, entered a plea of guilty to Count One of an Indictment charging him with possession with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). ECF 21; ECF 22 (Plea Agreement). In particular, the plea was entered under Rule 11(c)(1)(C), in which the parties jointly agreed to a sentence ranging between 84 to 120 months of imprisonment. ECF 22, ¶ 8. The parties also agreed that defendant qualified as a Career Offender. Id. ¶6B. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1.

         A Presentence Report (“PSR”) was prepared. ECF 25. The PSR reflects that Jackson qualified as a Career Offender, based on a criminal history that included prior convictions in Maryland for first degree assault, three distinct convictions for second degree assault, as well as first degree burglary. Id. ¶¶ 22, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37. Sentencing was held on June 12, 2013. ECF 3. The Court determined that Jackson was a Career Offender, with a final offense level of 29 and a Criminal History Category VI. ECF 34 at 1. Therefore, the applicable advisory sentencing guidelines range called for a sentence of 151 to 188 months. In accordance with the C plea, however, the Court sentenced the defendant to 108 months' of imprisonment. ECF 33 (Judgment).

         On June 6, 2016, the Federal Public Defender (“FPD”) filed a Motion to Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, based on Johnson v. United States, U.S., 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). ECF 36 (“Motion”). In Johnson, the Supreme Court struck down the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii), ruling that the definition of a “violent felony” was unconstitutionally vague. 135 S.Ct. at 2555-57; see also United States v. Winston, 850 F.3d 667, 680 (4th Cir. 2017) (explaining Johnson). Relying on Johnson, the FPD argued that Petitioner no longer qualified as a Career Offender because Jackson's prior convictions do not constitute crimes of violence. ECF 36 at 1.

         On March 6, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Beckles v. United States, ___U.S. ___, 137 S.Ct. 886 (2017). In Beckles, the Court determined that the advisory sentencing guidelines are not subject to Johnson challenges.

         Subsequent to Beckles, on August 18, 2017, the FPD asked Petitioner whether he wanted to withdraw his motions. ECF 37 at 2, 3. Petitioner was also advised that the FPD intended to submit a request to withdraw as counsel and, if granted, Petitioner would be proceeding without counsel. Id. at 3. Petitioner did not respond to the FPD. Id. at 2. On September 18, 2017, the FPD filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (ECF 37), which this Court granted. ECF 38.

         Pending before this Court is Petitioner's Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. ECF 36. The government did not respond. No hearing is necessary to resolve the Motion. See Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2016); 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b). For the reasons stated herein, I shall deny the Motion.

         DISCUSSION

         Petitioner claims that under Johnson he does not qualify as a Career Offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, because his prior convictions are not crimes of violence. ECF 36.

         U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(a) provides:

A defendant is a career offender if (1) the defendant was at least eighteen years old at the time the defendant committed the instant offense of conviction; (2) the instant offense of conviction is a felony that is either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense; and (3) the defendant has at least two prior felony convictions of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense.
Section 4B1.2(a) states, in part:
(a) The term “crime of violence” means any offense under federal or state law, punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, that --
(1) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.