Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Buy This Entire Record For
Yi v. Lotus Cars USA
United States District Court, D. Maryland
August 2, 2016
CHONG SU YI, Plaintiff
LOTUS CARS USA, Defendant
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
above-captioned complaint, invoking this court’s
federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1331, was filed together with a Motion to Proceed in Forma
Pauperis. ECF No. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to
Proceed in Forma Pauperis shall be granted. The facts and
arguments in this case follow:
After receiving 15 dollars under Code of Maryland Regulations
11.11.05.03; at 9/18/2015; on driver license renewal fee;
where none paying person could not drive; where law is
State’s expression protected under first amendment;
So when State speaks through legislated laws; pa 15 dollars
renewal fee; and public reply, by paying 15 dollars; and
there is reply back; is there legal obligation to State?
Example is if person advertises summer camp in internet; 40
dollars, and person sends in payment via email; and owner of
site reply back; Is there form of obligation by owner of
If so does obligation applies retroactively, for prior to
renewal of driver’s license; or does traffic points get
erased; i.e. obligation starts new in clean slate?
If not, if points on driver license stay, then automobile
ownership; when plaintiff was in lawful driver license before
the renewal; be deprived without due process of the law? If
so Statute of limitation without dread; fade of memory;
evidence et al; constitutional under ‘secure in their
Facts of the case are:
Plaintiff bought new car in 1999; canary yellow Lotus spirit
v8; $92, 000 dollars with 2yr bumper to bumper warranty; and
engine malfunctioned; at 3, 400 on odometer. Dealer refuse to
cover warranty; because oil was not changed at 1, 000 mile
mark; part of bumper to bumper warranty; dealer name was fox
valley motors; now known as global luxury imports; with Mr.
Nuccio; who still owns it; who sold the car; took the
responsibility at the time of sale of car; when it had
Exceptions are using as taxi, or not following maintenance
schedule; or racing. Car’s piston rod broke at 180 mph;
not eluding; not escaping police; and no crime was committed
but driving past 55 mph; of eluding evading charges were
dropped at trial. To see if car could reach 220 mph on speed
odometer; and engine stalled at 180 mph; with police in
souped up Camaro present; thus there was no racing; and
warranty was never denied under racing; stalled due to broken
To void warranty under maintenance, it has to be more than
one; plural “maintenances”;
“services’; it was not singular.
Fox valley did not honor warranty, or Lotus America.
Briton parent company states its American arm is not under
its own legal jurisdiction; therefore could not ...
Buy This Entire Record For