United States District Court, D. Maryland
June 12, 2015
MOHAMED R. DASHTIZADEH
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Mohamed R. Dashtizadeh has brought this action against Honeywell International, Inc. (the successor to Bendix Corporation) and Earl's Discount Auto Parts, Inc.
Plaintiff originally asserted a variety of claims against defendants. The only claims that he is now pursuing are those for strict liability and negligence. Discovery has been completed, and defendants have moved for summary judgment. Those motions will be granted.
There are two reasons that defendants' motions are clearly well-founded.
First, to the extent that the brakes to which plaintiff was exposed manufactured by Bendix and sold by Earl's contained asbestos. The brakes did not give rise to any viable claim because they contained a warning about the dangers of asbestos that fully complied with the applicable OSHAA requirements. See Kline v. ABCO Eng'g Corp., 991 F.Supp. 747, 750 (D. Md. 1997); Lightolier v. Hoon, 387 Md. 539, 557, 876 A.2d 100, 111 (2005).
Second, plaintiff cannot establish (by direct or circumstantial evidence) that brakes manufactured by Bendix and sold by Earl's constituted "a substantial factor" to his asbestosis. It is undisputed that by the time that plaintiff was exposed to any such brakes Bendix manufactured brakes, some of which contained asbestos and some of which did not. Plaintiff has presented absolutely no evidence that the brakes manufactured by Bendix and sold by Earl's contains asbestos.
A separate order granting defendants' motions and entering judgment on their behalf is being entered herewith.