IN RE: GREEN STAR TOWN HOUSE APARTMENTS, INC. COWPENS, LLC, Appellant,
GREEN STAR TOWN HOUSE APARTMENTS, INC., Appellee.
WILLIAM D. QUARLES, Jr., District Judge.
Cowpens, LLC ("Cowpens") appeals the bankruptcy's court's denial of its motion for a determination that real property was not part of Green Star Town House Apartments, Inc.'s ("Green Star") bankruptcy estate. The parties agree that the appeal is moot. Pending is Cowpens's motion to vacate the bankruptcy court's order. For the following reasons, the motion will be denied, and this appeal will be dismissed as moot.
Green Star's sole asset was a town house at 4000 Maine Avenue, Gwynn Oak, Maryland (the "Property") that it owned in fee simple. ECF No. 1-1 at 8. Its liabilities were $36, 468.00 in delinquent taxes to Baltimore City. See id. at 14. On May 17, 2010, Cowpens purchased the Property at a tax sale. ECF No. 1-7 at 2. On April 25, 2011, Cowpens filed for foreclosure in the Circuit. Court for Baltimore City, Maryland. at 5. On June 5, 2012, a final hearing was held before Judge Evelyn O. Cannon. Id. at 25-42. Judge Cannon indicated that unless Green Star redeemed the property, the judgment of foreclosure would be signed. Id. at 36.
On June 13, 2012, Green Star filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code. ECF No. 1-1; see No. 12-21120 (Bankr. D. Md.). On July 5, 2012, the Circuit. Court case was stayed because of the bankruptcy filing; no foreclosure order was entered. ECF No. 1-7 at 13.
On July 21, 2012, Cowpens moved for a determination that the Property was not an asset of the bankruptcy estate because of the tax sale. ECF No. On November 15, 2012,  U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert A. Gordon denied the motion. ECF No. 1-6. On December 14, 2012, Cowpens appealed, asserting that the bankruptcy court's order was a final order or, alternatively, requesting leave to appeal. ECF No. 1; see ECF No. 3 at 7-9. Green Star did not file a brief.
On January 28, 2013, Cowpens moved to dismiss the bankruptcy case, asserting that Green Star had grossly mismanaged the bankruptcy estate. No. 12-21120 (Banks. D. Md.), ECF No. 36. On March 21, 2013,  the bankruptcy court dismissed the case with prejudice. Id. ECF No. 59.
On April 10, 2013, this Court directed the parties to file memoranda addressing whether this appeal was mooted by the dismissal of the bankruptcy case. ECF No. 4. On April 26, 2013, Green Star responded, asserting that the appeal is moot because Cowpens obtained the relief it sought. ECF No. 5. On April 27, 2013, Cowpens acknowledged that the appeal is moot and moved to vacate the bankruptcy court's order. ECF No. 6.
The parties agree that this appeal is moot. See ECF Nos. 5, 6. Cowpens seeks vacatur of the bankruptcy court's denial of its motion for a determination that the Property was not part of the bankruptcy estate. ECF No. 6.
A. Appellate Jurisdiction
This Court has jurisdiction to hear appeals from final orders of the bankruptcy court or interlocutory orders if leave is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 158; see In re Kirkland, 600 F.3d 310, 314 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting district court's "capacity as a bankruptcy appellate court").
In bankruptcy cases, the finality principle "has traditionally been applied in a more pragmatic and less technical way... than in other situations." A.H. Robins Co., Inc. v. Piccinin, 788 F.2d 994, 1009 (4th Cir. 1986) (internal quotation marks omitted). "To avoid the waste of time and resources that might result from reviewing discrete portions of the action only after a plan of reorganization is approved, courts have permitted appellate review of orders that in other contexts might be considered interlocutory." "Accordingly, 'orders in bankruptcy cases may be immediately appealable if they finally dispose of discrete disputes within the larger case.'" "[I]n sum... an order is final and appealable if it (i) finally determines or seriously affects a party's substantive rights, or (ii) will cause irreparable harm to the losing party or waste judicial resources if the appeal is deferred under the conclusion of the bankruptcy case." Herrington v. Swyter (In re Swyter), 263 B.R. 742, 746 (E.D. Va. 2001).
Here, the bankruptcy court's order determined Cowpens's relationship with the debtor. The bankruptcy court held that the Property was part of the estate; this holding is fatal to Cowpens's claim that, under Maryland law, it held title. Not only did this finally determine Cowpens's rights, it also would have been a large waste of judicial resources if this Court had- after the completion of all bankruptcy proceedings-reversed that determination because the Property was Green Star's sole asset. See In re Swyter, 263 B.R. at 746. ...